Technology is continuously developing, and so web developers often argument which web design method will better accommodating the requirement of internet users. As more people gravitate towards the latest gadgets like tablets, mobile, smart watches and other tech stuff that use screens of various sizes, web design has to meet the challenges that those different screen sizes present. As a site owner, you want your website to look good on everything from the smart watch on your wrist to the web-enabled screen on your refrigerator door, so before selecting a web design method, let’s take a look at two of the most favorite design methods among web developers and confidently help you to make a choice.
The two most standard design methods are Responsive Web Design (RWD) and Adaptive Web Design (AWD). Both methods pursue to fulfil the same goal – showing websites on multiple devices. But which is superior?
Responsive Web Design (RWD)
RWD is primarily operated by a set of rules based on specific screen size and ratio. It utilizes fluid grids to create a flexible website basis where images, type, video and other content can coordinate the layout to the web-enabled screen. Additional Responsive Web Design rules include how things align from left to right, the specific height elements and certain styles that will transmit over from one screen to the next.
A website’s foundation designed with Responsive Web Design methods remains stretchy and can dynamically adjust to the viewing screen with using a predestined set of rules. For instance, a certain element may take up thirty% of the screen but on a different device it could be scaled to Twenty% and on another it could be scaled to Fifty%. This can be tested by resizing a website in your browser and seeing the elements shrink, grow and preposition.
Adaptive Web Design (AWD)
When using AWD, the design attentions on the user rather than the browser/screen. Instead of the layout being predefined by rules like in Responsive Web Design, Adaptive Web Design coordinates to the detected web-enabled device. While the principals are the same, Adaptive Web Design is stiffer in presentation because it relies on breakpoints to essentially serve as a trigger which will display an alternative website layout. These triggers are the devices with varying screen sizes that are being used to view on.
Like the test mentioned above where the Responsive Web Design layout shrinks and grows based on percentages, the resizing of an Adaptive Web Design is different. You may not notice a difference until you hit a certain trigger, at which point a new adjusted layout is presented and the layout will stay to alternate if you reach another breakpoints.
The Controversy
With both methods on the table, the dispute lies within the Adaptive Web Design breakpoints, because site administrators are able to custom-tailor a layout that is specific for users on their respective devices instead of relying on the Responsive Web Design s’ set of programmed rules to decide what is displayed.
While the Adaptive Web Designs’ custom-tailored layout may be ideal when it comes to the user being first, we prefer and recommend Responsive Web Design. This is due to the benefit of the dynamic elasticity that can take into account devices and screen sizes that don’t yet exist. This becomes a vital factor when you consider wearable tech that has been proliferate consumer interest more and more, e.g., Apple’s iWatch. In technical repetition, a responsive site should be 95% compliant and compatible with the new screen size. It could need a few additional rules but it’s much more effective and efficient than building a brand new interface for that size device.
For any further detail Visit http://digitaldezire.com
